4.4 Article

Effect of guided self-determination youth intervention integrated into outpatient visits versus treatment as usual on glycemic control and life skills: a randomized clinical trial in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

期刊

TRIALS
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-321

关键词

Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Adolescents; Outpatient clinic; Hospital; Clinical trials; Randomization; Empowerment

资金

  1. Research Foundation at Hillerod Hospital
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  3. Lundbeck Foundation
  4. Sahva Foundation
  5. Tryg Foundation
  6. Foundation of Senior Lieutenant Harald Jensen and Wife
  7. Pediatric Department at Hillerod Hospital
  8. Research Foundation of the Capital Region of Denmark
  9. Foundation of Mrs. Lily Benthine Lund
  10. Axel Muusfeldt Foundation
  11. Foundation of Master Cabinetmaker Sophus Jacobsen and his wife Astrid Jacobsen
  12. Ville Heise Foundation
  13. Beckett Foundation
  14. Health Insurance Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Providing care for adolescents with type 1 diabetes is complex, demanding, and often unsuccessful. Guided self-determination (GSD) is a life skills approach that has been proven effective in caring for adults with type 1 diabetes. To improve care, GSD was revised for adolescents, their parents, and interdisciplinary healthcare providers (HCP) to create GSD-Youth (GSD-Y). We evaluated the impact of GSD-Y after it was integrated into pediatric outpatient visits versus treatment-as-usual, focusing on glycemic control and the development of life skills in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Seventy one adolescents (mean age: 15 years, mean duration of diabetes: 5.7 years, mean HbA1c: 77 mmol/mol (9.1%), upon entering the study) from two pediatric departments were randomized into a GSD-Y group (n = 37, GSD-Y was provided during individual outpatient sessions) versus a treatment-as-usual group (n = 34). The primary outcome was the HbA1c measurement. The secondary outcomes were life skills development (assessed by self-reported psychometric scales), self-monitored blood glucose levels, and hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes. The analysis followed an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Fifty-seven adolescents (80%) completed the trial, and 53 (75%) completed a six-month post-treatment follow-up. No significant effect of GSD-Y on the HbA1c could be detected in a mixed-model analysis after adjusting for the baseline HbA1c levels and the identity of the HCP (P = 0.85). GSD-Y significantly reduced the amotivation for diabetes self-management after adjusting for the baseline value (P = 0.001). Compared with the control group, the trial completion was prolonged in the GSD-Y group (P < 0.001), requiring more visits (P = 0.05) with a higher rate of non-attendance (P = 0.01). GSD-Y parents participated in fewer of the adolescents' visits (P = 0.05) compared with control parents. Conclusions: Compared with treatment-as-usual, GSD-Y did not improve HbA1c levels, but it did decrease adolescents' amotivation for diabetes self-management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据