4.7 Review

Effector-triggered defence against apoplastic fungal pathogens

期刊

TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 491-500

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.009

关键词

apoplastic fungal pathogens; cell wall; extracellular matrix; receptor-like protein; R gene-mediated resistance

资金

  1. European Union [302202]
  2. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [RD-2009-3676]
  3. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [OREGIN - 1F0144]
  4. HGCA
  5. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  6. Perry Foundation
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I017585/2, BBS/E/C/00004693, BB/D015200/1, BB/E001610/1, BB/I017585/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [TS/I000747/1, TS/I000747/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. BBSRC [BB/E001610/1, BB/I017585/2, BB/D015200/1, BB/I017585/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. EPSRC [TS/I000747/1, TS/I000747/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

R gene-mediated host resistance against apoplastic fungal pathogens is not adequately explained by the terms pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) or effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Therefore, it is proposed that this type of resistance is termed 'effector-triggered defence' (ETD). Unlike PTI and ETI, ETD is mediated by R genes encoding cell surface-localised receptor-like proteins (RLPs) that engage the receptor-like kinase SOBIR1. In contrast to this extracellular recognition, ETI is initiated by intracellular detection of pathogen effectors. ETI is usually associated with fast, hypersensitive host cell death, whereas ETD often triggers host cell death only after an elapsed period of endophytic pathogen growth. In this opinion, we focus on ETD responses against foliar fungal pathogens of crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据