4.1 Article

Phrenic nerve conduction studies as a biomarker of respiratory insufficiency in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2015.1112406

关键词

Phrenic; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; neurophysiology; biomarker; ventilation

资金

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  2. ALS Association and Synapse Biomedical
  3. Philips Respironics
  4. Will Rogers Respiratory Institute of the ALS Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our objective was to examine the value of phrenic nerve conduction studies (PNCS) in quantifying diaphragm dysfunction in ALS, as no ideal test of respiratory insufficiency exists in ALS. We prospectively recorded bilateral PNCS, forced vital capacity (FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP), respiratory rate, ALSFRS-R, and respiratory symptoms in 100 ALS patients attending our clinic over a nine-month period. Survival data were collected for two years. Results showed that PNCS were reproducible and well tolerated. When the Pamp was abnormal (<0.3 mV), the relative risk of a respiratory rate >18 was 7.2 (95% CI 2.2-37.2, p<0.01) compared with a Pamp >= 0.3 mV. Similarly, the relative risk of orthopnea was 3.5 (95% CI 1.6-8.7, p<0.01) and dyspnea 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0, p<0.01). FVC had the strongest correlation with Pamp (R-2 = 0.48 (p<0.001)). Fourteen of 15 patients with a FVC <50% had a Pamp <0.3 mV. However, eight with a Pamp<0.3 had a FVC >80%. The median survival was 1.07 years when the Pamp was <0.3 mV and >2 years when the Pamp was >0.3 mV (p<0.001). In conclusion, the phrenic Pamp correlated closely with multiple symptoms, signs, and laboratory measures of respiratory insufficiency and may prove to be a useful biomarker of respiratory dysfunction in ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据