4.1 Article

A multi-center screening trial of rasagiline in patients with amyotrophic lateral

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2015.1026826

关键词

Biomarker; rasagiline; apoptosis; clinical trials; mitochondria

资金

  1. TEVA Pharmaceuticals
  2. Project ALS
  3. Institutional Clinical and Translational Science award (NIH/NCATS Grant) [UL1TR000001]
  4. University of Kansas Medical Center
  5. University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Center [P30AG035982]
  6. University of Kansas Medical Center for Frontiers: The Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translation Research [KL2TR000119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, slowed disease progression in the SOD1 mouse, and in a case series of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here we determine whether rasagiline is safe and effective in ALS compared to historical placebo controls, and whether it alters mitochondrial biomarkers. We performed a prospective open-label, multicenter screening trial of 36 ALS patients treated with 2 mg oral rasagiline daily for 12 months. Outcomes included the slope of deterioration of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), adverse event monitoring, time to treatment failure, and exploratory biomarkers. Participants experienced no serious drug-related adverse events, and the most common adverse event was nausea (11.1%). Rasagiline did not improve the rate of decline in the ALSFRS-R; however, differences in symptom duration compared to historical placebo controls differentially affected ALSFRS-R slope estimates. Rasagiline changed biomarkers over 12 months, such that the mitochondrial membrane potential increased (JC-1 red/green fluorescent ratio 1.92, p = 0.0001) and apoptosis markers decreased (Bcl-2/Bax ratio 0.24, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, engagement of exploratory biomarkers and questions about comparability of baseline characteristics lead us to recommend a further placebo-controlled trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据