4.7 Review

Quorum sensing and the confusion about diffusion

期刊

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 586-594

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.09.004

关键词

autoinduction; autoregulation; communication; exofactors; inclusive fitnesssignals

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  3. European Research Council (ERC)
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J007064/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/J007064/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two hypotheses, termed quorum sensing (QS) and diffusion sensing (DS), have been suggested as competing explanations for why bacterial cells use the local concentration of small molecules to regulate numerous extracellular behaviours. Here, we show that: (i) although there are important differences between QS and DS, they are not diametrically opposed; (ii) empirical attempts to distinguish between QS and DS are misguided and will lead to confusion; (iii) the fundamental distinction is not between QS and DS, but whether or not the trait being examined is social; (iv) empirical data are consistent with both social interactions and a role of diffusion; (v) alternate hypotheses, such as efficiency sensing (ES), are not required to unite QS and DS. More generally, work in this area illustrates how the use of jargon can obscure the underlying concepts and key questions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据