4.7 Review

Oxidative damage, ageing, and life-history evolution: where now?

期刊

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 570-577

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/H012850/1]
  2. Royal Society
  3. BBSRC [BB/G009953/1]
  4. '1000 Talents Recruitment Program' of the Chinese Government
  5. Key State Laboratory of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H021868/1, BB/G009953/1, BB/H012850/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E01237X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. BBSRC [BB/H021868/1, BB/G009953/1, BB/H012850/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. NERC [NE/E01237X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The idea that resources are limited and animals can maximise fitness by trading costly activities off against one another forms the basis of life-history theory. Although investment in reproduction or growth negatively affects survival, the mechanisms underlying such trade-offs remain obscure. One plausible mechanism is oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Here, we critically evaluate the premise that ROS-induced oxidative damage shapes life history, focussing on birds and mammals, and highlight the importance of ecological studies examining free-living animals within this experimental framework. We conclude by emphasising the value of using multiple assays to determine oxidative protection and damage. We also highlight the importance of using standardised and appropriate protocols, and discuss future research directions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据