4.7 Review

Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science

期刊

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 130-137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leon Levy Foundation
  2. Wolf Creek Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [OCI-0830944, CCF-0832782, ITR-0427914, DBI-1049363, DBI-0542868, DUE-0734857, IIS-0748626, IIS-0844546, IIS-0612031, IIS-1050422, IIS-0905385, IIS-0746500, AGS-0835821, CNS-0751152, CNS-0855167, TG-DEB110008]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0832782] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [0830944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  9. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0832804] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [0905885] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying ecological patterns across broad spatial and temporal extents requires novel approaches and methods for acquiring, integrating and modeling massive quantities of diverse data. For example, a growing number of research projects engage continent-wide networks of volunteers ('citizen-scientists') to collect species occurrence data. Although these data are information rich, they present numerous challenges in project design, implementation and analysis, which include: developing data collection tools that maximize data quantity while maintaining high standards of data quality, and applying new analytical and visualization techniques that can accurately reveal patterns in these data. Here, we describe how advances in data-intensive science provide accurate estimates in species distributions at continental scales by identifying complex environmental associations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据