4.7 Article

Monitoring does not always count

期刊

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 547-550

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nature Conservancy
  2. Applied Environmental Decision Analysis Commonwealth Environment Research Facility
  3. Australian Government's Department of Environment, Water, Heritage
  4. Arts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gross under-resourcing of conservation endeavours has placed an increasing emphasis on spending accountability. Increased accountability has led to monitoring forming a central element of conservation programs. Although there is little doubt that information obtained from monitoring can improve management of biodiversity, the cost (in time and/or money) of gaining this knowledge is rarely considered when making decisions about allocation of resources to monitoring. We present a simple framework allowing managers and policy advisors to make decisions about when to invest in monitoring to improve management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据