4.7 Review

Blood substitutes: why haven't we been more successful?

期刊

TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 177-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.02.006

关键词

Blood substitutes; Hemoglobin; Heme; Oxidative toxicity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HL110900]
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (MODSCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persistent safety concerns have stalled the development of viable hemoglobin (Hb)-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs). HBOCs have several advantages over human blood, including availability, long-term storage, and lack of infectious risk. The basis of HBOC toxicity is poorly understood, however, several mechanisms have been suggested, including Hb extravasation across the blood vessel wall, scavenging of endothelial nitric oxide (NO), oversupply of oxygen, and heme-mediated oxidative side reactions. Although there are some in vitro and limited animal studies supporting these mechanisms, heme-mediated reactivity appears to provide an alternative path that can explain some of the observed pathophysiological changes. Moreover, recent mechanistic and animal studies support a role for globin and heme scavengers in controlling oxidative toxicity associated with Hb infusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据