4.5 Article

Oxidation and reduction of sulfite contribute to susceptibility and detoxification of SO2 in Populus x canescens leaves

期刊

TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 399-411

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-013-0958-x

关键词

APR, Adenosine 5 '-phosphosulfate reductase; Gas exchange; GSH, Glutathione; Sulfate; SO, Sulfite oxidase; Sulfur dioxide

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Re515/32, HA3107/4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The critical level for SO (2) susceptibility of Populus x canescens is approximately 1.2 mu L L (-1) SO (2) . Both sulfite oxidation and sulfite reduction and assimilation contribute to SO (2) detoxification. In the present study, uptake, susceptibility and metabolism of SO2 were analyzed in the deciduous tree species poplar (Populus x canescens). A particular focus was on the significance of sulfite oxidase (SO) for sulfite detoxification, as SO has been characterized as a safety valve for SO2 detoxification in herbaceous plants. For this purpose, poplar plants were exposed to different levels of SO2 (0.65, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 mu L L-1) and were characterized by visible injuries and at the physiological level. Gas exchange parameters (stomatal conductance for water vapor, CO2 assimilation, SO2 uptake) of the shoots were compared with metabolite levels (sulfate, thiols) and enzyme activities [SO, adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase (APR)] in expanding leaves (80-90 % expanded). The critical dosage of SO2 that confers injury to the leaves was 1.2 mu L L-1 SO2. The observed increase in sulfur containing compounds (sulfate and thiols) in the expanding leaves strongly correlated with total SO2 uptake of the plant shoot, whereas SO2 uptake rate was strongly correlated with stomatal conductance for water vapor. Furthermore, exposure to high concentration of SO2 revealed channeling of sulfite through assimilatory sulfate reduction that contributes in addition to SO-mediated sulfite oxidation to sulfite detoxification in expanding leaves of this woody plant species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据