4.5 Article

Carbon balance and allocation of assimilated CO2 in Scots pine, Norway spruce, and Silver birch seedlings determined with gas exchange measurements and 14C pulse labelling

期刊

TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 611-621

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-008-0306-8

关键词

Allocation; Carbon; C-14 labelling; Photosynthesis; Root and rhizosphere respiration

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide is released from the soil to the atmosphere in heterotrophic respiration when the dead organic matter is used for substrates for soil micro-organisms and soil animals. Respiration of roots and mycorrhiza is another major source of carbon dioxide in soil CO2 efflux. The partitioning of these two fluxes is essential for understanding the carbon balance of forest ecosystems and for modelling the carbon cycle within these ecosystems. In this study, we determined the carbon balance of three common tree species in boreal forest zone, Scots pine, Norway spruce, and Silver birch with gas exchange measurements conducted in laboratory in controlled temperature and light conditions. We also studied the allocation pattern of assimilated carbon with C-14 pulse labelling experiment. The photosynthetic light responses of the tree species were substantially different. The maximum photosynthetic capacity (P (max)) was 2.21 mu g CO2 s(-1) g(-1) in Scots pine, 1.22 mu g CO2 s(-1) g(-1) in Norway spruce and 3.01 mu g CO2 s(-1) g(-1) in Silver birch seedlings. According to the pulse labelling experiments, 43-75% of the assimilated carbon remained in the aboveground parts of the seedlings. The amount of carbon allocated to root and rhizosphere respiration was about 9-26%, and the amount of carbon allocated to root and ectomycorrhizal biomass about 13-21% of the total assimilated CO2. The (CO2)-C-14 pulse reached the root system within few hours after the labelling and most of the pulse had passed the root system after 48 h. The transport rate of carbon from shoot to roots was fastest in Silver birch seedlings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据