4.7 Article

Electrical capacitance as a rapid and non-invasive indicator of root length

期刊

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 3-17

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps115

关键词

agroforestry; carbon sequestration; conducting tissue; Dalton Model; four terminal; eucalyptus; roots; rooting; three terminal; tissue density; two terminal; permittivity; xylem

类别

资金

  1. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
  2. Department of Education Science and Training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurement of tree root systems by conventional methods is a Herculean task. The electrical capacitance method offers a rapid and non-destructive alternative, but it has largely been restricted to herbaceous species. The Dalton Model has been the main concept for understanding equivalent root circuitry; it proposed that roots were cylindrical capacitors with epidermis and xylem being the external and internal electrodes. Capacitance (C) therefore varied in proportion to root surface area (A), mass (M), length (L) and relative permittivity of the plant tissue epsilon(r). We used the capacitance method on forest and plantation trees (13 to circa 100 y.o.) in situ to test hypotheses derived from implicit assumptions about tree-root-soil circuitry. We concluded: C was not confounded by intermingled root systems; C was strongly related to diameter at breast height (DBH); C was less strongly related to DBH for multiple species at the same site; and C was a poor indicator of DBH, M and L across species, ages and sites. We proposed that epsilon(r) was proportional to root tissue density rho and fitted a model with P < 0.05 and R-2 = 0.70 when the three immature (13 y.o.) trees were excluded. There was no significant difference (P = 0.28) between the parameters of the tree model (excluding the immature trees) and one of the same form fitted to data from bean (Vicia faba L.; R-2 = 0.55). Together, the data sets suggested (R-2 = 0.94; n = 26) that there may exist a general relationship of this form applied over two orders of magnitude of L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据