4.5 Article

Fine-scale environmental variation contributes to introgression in a three-species spruce hybrid complex

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0817-y

关键词

Spruce; Admixture; Hybrid zones; Climate change; Local adaptation

资金

  1. Genome British Columbia
  2. Genome Canada
  3. Province of British Columbia
  4. British Columbia Forest Genetics Council
  5. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  6. NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship
  7. UBC Fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybridization is common for many forest trees, where weak barriers to reproduction obscure species boundaries. We characterized the genomic structure of Picea populations comprising three species spanning two well-known contact zones, the Picea sitchensisxPicea glauca and the P. engelmanniixP. glauca hybrid zones, using a set of 71 candidate-gene single nucleotide polymorphisms. The genetic structure of populations suggests a complex genomic architecture shaped by interspecific gene flow and strong environmental selection, with increased genetic diversity in hybrids. The presence of admixture among all three species suggests that three-way hybrids with mixed ancestry occur where species ranges overlap in transitional environments. Significant clinal variation and associations with climatic variables (including continentality, temperature, and precipitation) differ between hybrid zones, indicating that individual species and their hybrids are adapted to distinct environmental niches. Allele-environmental association analysis revealed that most of the candidate genes with evidence of selection were unique to either the Sitkaxwhite or the Engelmannxwhite hybrid zones, with few shared between these zones. Management of these widespread and diverse gene pools will be best served through development of climate-based seed transfer, with recommended seed sources informed by a combination of genetic and climatic information for future climates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据