4.5 Article

Spatial genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.): II. Effect of density and clonal propagation on spatial genetic structure based on simulation studies

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 541-552

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0354-2

关键词

Spatial genetic structure; Density; Clonal propagation; Simulation; Forest management; Genetic diversity

资金

  1. German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Erfassung der genetischen Struktur der Vogelkirsche (Prunus avium) als Grundlage fur ein genetisches Monitoring wichtiger Waldbaumarten in Deutschland [05/BE003/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted simulations to disentangle the effect of density and clonal propagation on spatial genetic structure and genetic diversity parameters in Prunus avium. In a previous paper, we observed stronger family structure in populations exhibiting high density and high clonal propagation, whereas one low-density and low clonal propagation population showed negative spatial autocorrelation. We tried to understand these results by simulating 200 years of growth, mating and dispersal with the model Eco-Gene, using two levels of density and three levels of clonal propagation in one high-density population (Spargrunde) and one low-density population (Chorin). We used allele frequencies from eight microsatellite loci to generate the populations used for simulations. In order to detect effects of the initial structure on the results, we also ran the simulations starting from the real data. We observed positive effect of clonal propagation on the strength of SGS, while high densities exhibited a negative impact. Genetic diversity was maintained at high densities, while pollen dispersal was shorter. Heterozygosity increased at higher clonal propagation rates, although genetic diversity (accumulated number of genotypes) was lower. We discuss the results according to mating processes and potential management scenario.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据