4.5 Article

Revisiting protein heterozygosity in plants-nucleotide diversity in allozyme coding genes of conifer Pinus sylvestris

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 385-397

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0340-8

关键词

Allozyme; Heterozygosity; Nucleotide diversity; Pinus sylvestris; Population

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [EVOLTREE 016322]
  2. Biocenter Oulu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allozyme variation has been and continues to be a major source of information on the level of genetic variation among plant species. Deciphering the molecular basis of electrophoretic variation is essential for understanding the forces affecting the protein level variation. In this study, the relationship between allozyme heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity in plants is investigated among and within species. Allozyme and nucleotide diversity in 27 plant species was reviewed. At the multilocus level, the two methods are congruent: a clear correlation between the two measures of genetic diversity among plant species was observed, strengthening the view that effective population size is the major determinant of genome-wide diversity. Nucleotide diversity at six allozyme coding genes (6pgdB, aco, gdh, gotC, mdhA, and mdhB) in conifer Pinus sylvestris was investigated jointly with electrophoretic data. Single non-synonymous charge-changing mutations were found together with electrophoretic alleles that consequently were mutationally unique. Synonymous site nucleotide diversity (point estimate of theta (W)-0.009 per bp) and silent site divergence from Pinus pinaster at allozyme coding loci were at comparable levels with other loci in the species. Linkage disequilibrium was extensive compared to earlier estimates from P. sylvestris and other trees, spanning several kilobases. Allozyme coding genes had an excess of closely related haplotypes whose frequency has recently increased possibly as a result of partial selective sweeps or balancing selection, but complex demographic effects cannot be excluded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据