4.5 Article

Highly efficient transformation of the GFP and MAC12.2 genes into precocious trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata [L.] Raf), a potential model genotype for functional genomics studies in Citrus

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 529-537

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-009-0206-0

关键词

Agrobacterium tumefaciens; Citrus; Green fluorescent protein; Precocious trifoliate orange; Transformation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. National 863 Project [2006AA100108, 2007AA10Z182]
  3. Key Project of Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2008CDA069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precocious trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata [L.] Raf), an extremely early flowering mutant of P. trifoliata, is an attractive model for functional genomics research in Citrus. A procedure for efficient regeneration and transformation of this genotype was developed by using green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene as visual marker and etiolated stem segments as explants. In vivo monitoring of GFP expression permitted a rapid and easy discrimination of transgenic shoots and escapes. Transformation efficiency was 20.7% and the transformants were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot analysis. Moreover, the transgenic lines expressed variable amounts of the GFP gene as revealed by real-time PCR analysis. Fifteen transgenic plants flowered 18 months after transfer to the greenhouse and six of them set fruits. GFP expression was also observed in the transgenic flowers and fruits. To test the utility of this system for functional genomics studies, an Arabidopsis thaliana MAC12.2 gene with the potential to produce seedless fruits was introduced into this genotype, and the traits of the transgenic fruits were characterized. The successful transformation of this perennial woody genotype with extremely short juvenility will allow us to test the function of cloned genes in citrus, the improvement of which is hindered by a long juvenility period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据