4.5 Article

Forecasting Adoption of Ultra-Low-Emission Vehicles Using Bayes Estimates of a Multinomial Probit Model and the GHK Simulator

期刊

TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 671-683

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2013.0464

关键词

discrete choice models; Bayesian econometrics; low-emission vehicles; charging infrastructure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development [CAREER Award] [CBET-1253475]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1253475] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we use Bayes estimates of a multinomial probit model with fully flexible substitution patterns to forecast consumer response to ultra-low-emission vehicles. In this empirical application of the probit Gibbs sampler, we use stated-preference data on vehicle choice from a Germany-wide survey of potential light-duty-vehicle buyers using computer-assisted personal interviewing. We show that Bayesian estimation of a multinomial probit model with a full covariance matrix is feasible for this medium-scale problem and provides results that are very similar to maximum simulated likelihood estimates. Using the posterior distribution of the parameters of the vehicle choice model as well as the GHK simulator, we derive the choice probabilities of the different alternatives. We first show that the Bayes point estimates of the market shares reproduce the observed values. Then we define a base scenario of vehicle attributes that aims to represent an average of the current vehicle choice situation in Germany. Consumer response to qualitative changes in the base scenario is subsequently studied. In particular, we analyze the effect of increasing the network of service stations for charging electric vehicles as well as for refueling hydrogen. The result is the posterior distribution of the choice probabilities that represent adoption of the energy-efficient technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据