4.4 Article

Vulnerability Analysis of Transportation Network Under Scenarios of Sea Level Rise

期刊

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
卷 -, 期 2263, 页码 174-181

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3141/2263-19

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. China National High Technology Research and Development Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change is attracting increasing attention from transportation planners, engineers, and decision makers. As a result of climate change, sea level rise is rapidly becoming a major concern, especially for coastal regions. This paper develops an accessibility-based process to analyze transportation network vulnerability to quantify networkwide vulnerability and to identify the most vulnerable regions under different scenarios of sea level rise. The accessibility reduction rate before and after inundation is calculated to measure the potential consequences. The probability of different sea level rise scenarios-together with the overall accessibility reduction-contributes to the overall vulnerability of the transportation network. Most notably, the traffic analysis zones with the most accessibility reduction are considered the most vulnerable areas. This methodology is applied to the south Miami, Florida, road network under two sea level rise scenarios for 2060. The authors estimated the extent of road network vulnerability and accessibility reduction of individual traffic analysis zones for the two scenarios. The results show an almost 100% accessibility reduction for traffic analysis zones with all roads inundated and as high as 30% accessibility reduction in zones with some or no roads directly affected. This information can help local transportation planners, engineers, and decision makers identify the most vulnerable areas and transportation facilities resulting from sea level rise so as to make better and more informed decisions about adaptation planning and retrofitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据