4.6 Article

Network-Based Life Cycle Optimization of the Net Atmospheric CO2-eq Ratio (NACR) of Fuels and Chemicals Production from Biomass

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 1732-1744

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00262

关键词

Network optimization; Life cycle optimization; MINLP; Biofuels; Bioproducts

资金

  1. Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern University (ISEN)
  2. Argonne National Laboratory via a Northwestern-Argonne Early Career Investigator Award for Energy Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A biofuels and bioproducts conversion network is optimized over unit cost and unit greenhouse gas emissions objectives. We use a multiobjective, functional unit approach based on the life cycle analysis methodology with simultaneous consideration of capital budget constraints. A novel functional unit of mass of input biogenic CO2-eq is proposed to capture common benefits of bioproducts and biofuels. A novel dimensionless net atmospheric carbon ratio (NACR) for bioconversion processes is defined that captures the life cycle carbon footprint of the process from feedstock cultivation to product end use. The model is formulated as a nonconvex multiobjective mixed integer nonlinear fractional programming problem. We address computational complexity by developing a novel global optimization algorithm that incorporates the parametric algorithm and successive piecewise linear approximations to estimate nonconvex terms, and we introduce nonlinear programming subproblems to ensure global convergence under capital cost budget constraints. We consider large-scale case studies of a bioconversion network of 200 technologies and 142 materials/compounds where fuels and chemicals can be made from biomass. Unit costs range from -$0.27 to -$0.43/kg input CO2-eq, and the NACRs range from 0.17 to 0.25. An optimal NACR that includes biofuel combustion emissions over a network where only biofuels are produced was found to be 1.90.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据