4.6 Article

Understanding the Pine Dilute Acid Pretreatment System for Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 2423-2428

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00417

关键词

Loblolly pine; Dilute acid pretreatment; Saccharification; Buffer strength; Biomass rinsing

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [GO88036]
  2. Arkansas Center for Plant Powered Production (P3)
  3. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, U.S.
  4. RII: Arkansas ASSET Initiatives (AR EPSCoR) I by National Science Foundation [EPS-0701890]
  5. RII: Arkansas ASSET Initiatives (AR EPSCoR) II by National Science Foundation [EPS-1003970]
  6. Arkansas Science and Technology Center, U.S.A.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the United States, loblolly pine is touted as a potential feedstock for biobased product manufacturing, as it is fast growing and abundant in the southeast. To release the sugar content from pine biomass, pretreatment must occur. Dilute acid pretreatment is, among others, a pretreatment method that can be used. Unfortunately, this pretreatment results in the production of inhibitory byproducts, which need to be removed prior to enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation; the main inhibitors include organic acids predominantly formic and acetic. Rinsing dilute acid pretreated biomass is a way to remove inhibitory byproducts. Buffering capacity of the enzymatic hydrolysis reaction mixture alleviates inhibition due to organic acids, while maintaining a pH environment that is conducive to enzymatic activity. However, the use of buffer salts at commonly prepared concentrations, such as 50 mM, may not be economically viable at production scale and could hinder fermentation due to their chelating capacity. In this study, two enzymatic hydrolysis citrate buffer strengths, 5 mM and 50 mM, were investigated for their effect on the level of saccharification of rinsed (30X) and unrinsed (0X) acid pretreated pine biomass. Buffer strength did not affect saccharification as long as the pretreated biomass was rinsed. Saccharification was still possible in unwashed biomass as long as the buffer concentration was 50 mM, where 65% saccharification was obtained. Although formic acid, acetic acid, HMF, and furfural concentrations were higher in unrinsed hydrolyzates than in their rinsed counterparts, saccharification could still occur, indicating that these compounds are not the sole culprits in conferring inhibition. No hydrolysis was observed when unrinsed biomass was subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis in 5 mM buffer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据