4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of spironolactone in an experimental model of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 273-278

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.025

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Cyclosporine (CsA)-associated nephrotoxicity is a long-term complication in transplant patients. Chronic CsA nephrotoxicity is associated with renal fibrosis and hyaline arteriolopathy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of spironolactone on functional and structural alterations as well as on platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-B) and transforming growth factor (TGF) beta expression induced by CsA in a rat model of chronic CsA nephrotoxicity. Materials and Methods. Twenty-four rats were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (G1) received vehicle only (V); G2, CsA (15 mg/kg/d; CsA) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection; and G3, a similar CsA dosage + spironolactone (20 mg/kg/d; CsA + Ald.) by the oral route. At the end of 28 days, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood CsA levels were measured as well as histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses performed on renal tissue. Results. Mean CsA trough levels in G2 and G3 were both above 2000 ng/mL. In G2, GFR was lower than G1 and G3 (0.35 +/- 0.05, 1.64 +/- 0.24, and 1.20 +/- 0.25 mL/min, respectively; P < .001). There was a significantly increased number of arteriolopathic changes in G2 and G3 vs G1 (16% +/- 3.7%, 15% +/- 6.8%, 3% +/- 1.2%, respectively; P < .001). Interstitial fibrosis was significantly increased in G2 vs G1 and G3 (52%, 0%, 27%, respectively; P < .05). Marked by up-regulated PDGF-B and TGF beta expressions were observed in G2 vs G1 or G3: 100%, 0%, 37.5%, respectively, for PDGF-B (P < .001) and 87.5%, 0%, 12.5%, respectively, for TGF beta (P < .001). Conclusion. Our results suggested that chronic CsA nephrotoxicity may be mitigated by aldosterone receptor blockade which seemed to be associated with down-regulation of PDGF-B and TGF beta expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据