4.6 Article

Impacts of the 2013 Extreme Flood in Northeast China on Regional Groundwater Depth and Quality

期刊

WATER
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 4575-4592

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w7084575

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSZD-EW-Z-021]
  2. CAS/SAFEA
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371108]
  4. Scientific Research Project of the Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Water Resources, China [201401014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flooding's impact on shallow groundwater is not well investigated. In this study, we analyzed changes in the depth and quality of a regional shallow aquifer in the 10.9 x 10(4) km(2) Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China, following a large flood in the summer of 2013. Pre- (2008-2012) and post-flood records on groundwater table depth and groundwater chemistry were gathered from 20 wells across the region. Spatial variability of groundwater recharge after the flood was assessed and the changes in groundwater quality in the post-flood period were determined. The study found a considerable increase in the groundwater table after the 2013 summer flood across the region, with the largest (3.20 m) and fastest (0.80 m center dot s(-1)) rising height occurring in western Sanjiang Plain. The rising height and velocity gradually declined from the west to the east of the plain. For the entire region, we estimated an average recharge height of 1.24 m for the four flood months (June to September) of 2013. Furthermore, we found that the extreme flood reduced nitrate (NO3-) and chloride (Cl-) concentrations and electrical conductivity (EC) in shallow groundwater in the areas that were close to rivers, but increased NO3- and Cl- concentrations and EC in the areas that were under intensive agricultural practices. As the region's groundwater storage and quality have been declining due to the rapidly increasing rice cultivation, this study shows that floods should be managed as water resources to ease the local water shortage as well as shallow groundwater pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据