4.6 Article

Substantial Proliferation of Human Renal Tubular Epithelial CellYReactive CD4+CD28null Memory T Cells, Which Is Resistant to Tacrolimus and Everolimus

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 47-55

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000435697.31148.b2

关键词

Memory T cells; CD4(+)CD28(null); Immunosuppression; Renal tubular epithelial cells; Tacrolimus; Everolimus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In spite of maintenance treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, tubulitis still occurs and can lead to structural kidney graft damage. We hypothesize that human renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) trigger selective proliferation of recipient T-cell subsets with variable sensitivity to immunosuppressive drugs. Methods Recipient peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with donor-derived TECs for 7 days. The proliferation of the total CD4(+) T-cell pool was assessed. Next, we analyzed which CD4(+) T-cell subset proliferated and how this response was affected by tacrolimus, everolimus, prednisolone, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) in clinically relevant concentrations. Results CD4(+) T-cell proliferation upon TEC encounter was mainly executed by memory T cells. Interestingly, 38%7% of the proliferating CD4(+) T-cell pool showed a CD28(null) phenotype. These proliferating CD4(+)CD28(null) memory T cells produced high levels of interferon-, tumor necrosis factor-, and the cytolitic protease granzyme B. TEC-reactive CD4(+) T-cell proliferation was significantly suppressed by tacrolimus, everolimus, prednisolone, and MPA (P<0.05). Surprisingly and in contrast to prednisolone and MPA, neither tacrolimus nor everolimus could inhibit the CD4(+)CD28(null) T-cell proliferative response. Conclusion Our data show substantial proliferation of TEC-reactive CD4(+)CD28(null) memory T cells, which are resistant to tacrolimus and everolimus. This phenomenon might play an important mechanistic role during cellular rejection under full immunosuppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据