4.6 Article

Management of the Brain-Dead Organ Donor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 95, 期 7, 页码 966-974

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318283298e

关键词

Brain death; Randomized controlled trials; Directed tissue donation; Tissue and organ procurement

资金

  1. Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa e Eventos from Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The shortage of organs is a limitation for transplantation, making the care of potential organ donors an important issue. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to assess the efficacy of interventions to stabilize hemodynamics in brain-dead donors or to improve organ function and outcomes of transplantation. Methods. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Of 5096 articles retrieved, 39 randomized controlled trials were selected. Twenty were included in a qualitative synthesis, providing data on 1277 patients. The main interventions described were desmopressin use, triiodothyronine and methylprednisolone replacement, fluid management, vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation strategies, and surgical techniques. Results. Three meta-analyses were conducted: the first included two studies and showed that desmopressin administered to brain-dead patients was not advantageous with respect to early organ function in kidney recipients (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.10; I-2=0%; P=0.809). The second included four studies and showed that triiodothyronine did not add hemodynamic benefits versus standard management (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.42; I-2=17.4%; P=0.304). The third meta-analysis (two studies) showed that ischemic liver preconditioning during harvesting procedures did not benefit survival (relative risk, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; I-2=0%; P=0.459). Conclusion. The present results suggest limited efficacy of interventions focusing on the management of brain-dead donors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据