4.6 Article

Increased Early Graft Failure in Right-Sided Living Donor Nephrectomy

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 91, 期 1, 页码 108-114

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181fd0179

关键词

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Right-sided donor nephrectomy; Early graft failure

资金

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration [231-00-0115]
  2. NIH [K23 - DK078688-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is well established; however, there is concern about early graft loss because of technical issues with right-sided LDN. Prior studies on the subject were mostly single centered and not powered to detect clinically significant differences in allograft failure. Method. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of recipients of live donor kidney transplants using national registry data. The primary endpoint was 90-day allograft failure. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were stratified as overall live donor transplantation, transplantation after LDN, and transplantation after open donor nephrectomy (ODN). Results. Between 2001 and 2006, a total of 2555 right LDNs, 25,387 left LDNs, 2496 right ODNs, and 5552 left ODNs were performed. For the entire cohort compared with ODN, LDN was not associated with early allograft loss (odds ratio [OR]=0.94, P=0.4); however, right-sided nephrectomy increased the risk of allograft loss (OR=1.49, P=0.01). When stratified by procedure type, right LDN (OR=1.58, P=0.01) and right ODN (OR=1.38, P=0.02) demonstrated an association with increased risk of graft failure compared with the left side. The observed risk of allograft failure with right-sided LDN was 3.8% vs. 2.5% with left-sided LDN. Conclusion. Right-sided donor nephrectomy is associated with a small increased risk of allograft failure regardless of open or laparoscopic approach. However, the low observed risk of allograft failure with right-sided nephrectomy suggests that recovering the right kidney is a reasonable option for donors with contraindications for donating the left kidney.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据