4.6 Article

Alginate Macroencapsulation of Pig Islets Allows Correction of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in Primates up to 6 Months Without Immunosuppression

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 90, 期 10, 页码 1054-1062

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f6e267

关键词

Pig islets; Xenotransplantation; Primates; Encapsulation; Diabetes correction

资金

  1. Foundation Louvain, Universite catholique de Louvain
  2. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Medicale, Brussels [3-4503-03]
  3. Fonds Special de Recherche, Communaute Francaise, Belgium
  4. European grant [UELSHB-CT-2006-037377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. This study assessed the capacity of alginate-encapsulated islets to reverse diabetes in a pig-to-primate model. Methods. Adult pig islets were encapsulated in microcapsules implanted under the kidney capsule (n = 4) or in a subcutaneous macrodevice (n = 5) in diabetic primates. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, porcine C-peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), and cellular and humoral responses were followed. Results. Nonencapsulated pig islets were rejected within 7 days. A transient decrease of FBG was observed only during the 2 weeks after microencapsulated pig islet implantation under the kidney capsule. After subcutaneous transplantation of a macrodevice, diabetes was corrected up to a maximum of 6 months in five animals: FBG less than 107 mg/dL and HbA1C at 8% +/- 1.4%. Two of the five animals received a new macrodevice between 25 and 35 weeks after the first graft dysfunction (HbA1C >= 13), and diabetes was controlled for an additional 18 weeks in these animals. Although a strong humoral response was elicited after transplantation of encapsulated islets, a total impermeability of alginate 3% wt/vol to IgG was demonstrated before and up to 20 weeks after transplantation of the subcutaneous macrodevice. Conclusions. Pig islets encapsulated in a subcutaneous macrodevice can control diabetes up to 6 months without immunosuppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据