4.6 Article

One Liver for Four Children: First Clinical Series of Liver Cell Transplantation for Severe Neonatal Urea Cycle Defects

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 636-641

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199936a

关键词

Hepatocyte transplantation; Cryopreserved hepatocytes; Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency; Carbamoylphosphate synthase deficiency; Citrullinaemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Urea cycle disorders (UCD) have a poor prognosis despite dietary and pharmacologic therapy, especially if the onset of the disease is within the neonatal period. They are promising target diseases for liver cell transplantation (LCT), which may be a less invasive alternative or supplementation to orthotopic liver transplantation. Methods. Cryopreserved hepatocytes were isolated under good manufacturing practice conditions. Four children with severe neonatal UCD (age 1 day-3 years) received multiple intraportal infusions of cryopreserved hepatocytes from that same donor, a 9-day old neonate. Portal vein access was achieved surgically in two children, whereas the umbilical vein was suitable for interventional catheter placement in two neonates. Cell applications were carefully monitored by means of Doppler ultrasound and portal vein pressure. Results. LCT was feasible in all children. No signs of portal vein thrombosis or extrahepatic shunting were observed. All children showed metabolic stabilization during observation periods of 4 to 13 months. One child with prenatally diagnosed ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency died after 4 months from a fatal metabolic decompensation. Conclusions. Given the poor prognosis of UCD with conservative therapy, LCT caused considerable beneficial effects. Periods of hyperammonemia and clinically relevant crises could be reduced during an observation period of up to 13 months. Though cell therapy is not a permanent therapeutic option, bridging to liver transplantation may be substantially improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据