4.6 Article

The Influence of Deceased Donor Age and Old-for-Old Allocation on Kidney Transplant Outcome

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 542-552

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b0fa8b

关键词

Donor age; Kidney transplantation; Regression models; Old-for-old; Simulation

资金

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration [231-00-0115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Transplantation of older deceased donor kidneys is gaining wide acceptance in most countries. Many previous studies have concluded that advanced donor age negatively impacts posttransplant outcome, but detailed data on the extent to which a few years increase in donor age will influence early graft function and graft survival are scarce. Methods. We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (cohort 1994-2006, n=99,860 recipients) to evaluate the effect of deceased donor age on posttransplant results and to obtain regression models which are relevant to guide clinical organ allocation policies. In addition, we simulated the effect that old-for-old allocation would have on transplant outcome. Results. In the context of other risk factors, donor age increased the risk of delayed graft function and graft failure with odds and hazard ratios of 1.02 and 1.01, respectively. Absolute delayed graft function risk increased by 0.35% to 0.37%, and graft survival decreased with each year increase in donor age. Kidney discard rates in the United States increased with donor age, up to 66.9% for 65 years and older donors. In our simulation, we found that old-for-old kidney allocation would have no large impact on overall renal transplant outcome. Conclusions. This study shows that donor age strongly influences posttransplant outcome, not only in the upper extremes but also for the whole range of donor ages more than or equal to 11 years. Implementation of old-for-old kidney allocation is likely to be safe. Such a policy could reduce waiting time for aged candidates, but it will not necessarily improve overall kidney transplant outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据