4.6 Article

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Ezetimibe in Cardiac Transplant Recipients Taking Cyclosporin

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 771-775

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318198d7d0

关键词

Ezetimibe; Transplantation; Vasculopathy; Hyperlipidemia

资金

  1. Schering Plough

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Despite statin treatment, hyperlipidemia remains problematic after cardiac transplantation and is associated with the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe may offer a viable option for add oil therapy; however, questions have been raised regarding the safety of this during concomitant cyclosporin treatment. Methods. This is the first placebo controlled, randomized double blinded trial assessing the efficacy and tolerability of ezetimibe in cardiac transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin. Sixty-eight cardiac transplant patients were randomized to receive ezetimibe (10 mg) or matching placebo for 6 months ill addition to usual treatments. Fasting blood tests were performed at regular time intervals during the study. Results. Fifty-nine patients completed the study. At 6 months, ezetimibe had reduced total cholesterol by 18% (5.4 +/- 1.1 to 4.4 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, P<0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 26% (3.0 +/- 1.0 to 2.1 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, P<0.001), and triglycerides by 13.5% (2.3+1.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/L, P=0.02). Tolerability was excellent with no patients experiencing predefined safety endpoints. An equal number of patients withdrew consent from each arm of the study because of perceived side effects. Specific analysis confirmed ezetimibe had no significant effect on cyclosporin levels. Conclusion. We conclude that ezetimibe is both efficacious and tolerable in cardiac transplant recipients taking cyclosporin. It can be safely considered as add on therapy in patients taking statins (or as monotherapy) to further reduce low-density lipoprotein levels, which may in turn reduce the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据