4.6 Article

Sustained BK Viruria as an Early Marker for the Development of BKV-Associated Nephropathy: Analysis of 4128 Urine and Serum Samples

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 89-95

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181aa8f62

关键词

BKV; PCR; Urine; Serum; Renal transplantation

资金

  1. Wyett Pharma AG
  2. Roche Pharma AG
  3. [SFB 650]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. BKV reactivation plays the causative role in the development of BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). Because of the lack of effective therapy, early diagnosis of BKV reactivation is paramount for the prevention of BKVAN. Resting in uroepithelial cells, BKV is excreted first in urine before it call be detected in plasma. The present study analyzed predictive value of BK viruria for the development of BK viremia and its possible advantage for the early BKVAN prediction. Methods. Total of 4128 urine and serum samples obtained from renal transplant patients were analyzed for BKV positivity by real-time polymerase chain reaction in 433 patients in cross-sectional and in 233 patients in longitudinal manner, respectively. The prospective longitudinal analysis included seven measurements during the first posttransplant year. Results. A total of 7% and 19% patients were positive for BKV in serum and Urine, respectively. Sustained BK viruria showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 94% for BK viremia and was associated with significantly higher level of BK load than the patients with transient viruria (P<0.01). Interestingly, BK viremia was preceded by BK viruria: the peak of viral load and number of positive patients appeared during the third and fifth posttransplant month for urine and serum, respectively. BKVAN diagnosed in 21.4% of patient with persistent BK viruria appeared 5 and 11 weeks after BKV reactivation in serum and urine, respectively, was detected. Conclusion. Sustained BK viruria is a reliable marker allowing all early identification of patients at high risk of BKVAN development and therefore assure precocious therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据