4.6 Article

Reduction in erythropoietin resistance after conversion from Sirolimus to enteric coated mycophenolate sodium

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 548-553

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181814a96

关键词

kidney transplantation; anemia; sirolimus; enteric coated mycophenolate sodium

资金

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Research Grant
  2. The Leonard Rosenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Anemia is a known adverse effect of sirolimus (SRL) therapy. Sirolimus may contribute to anemia by a direct antiproliferative effect or by increasing inflammation, worsening kidney function, or decreasing iron utilization. After observing the need for high dose exogenous erythropoietin dosage in some patients on SRL, we hypothesized that SRI, therapy may influence anemia by inducing a state of erythropoietin resistance. Methods. Twenty-five stable renal transplant patients on maintenance tacrolimus and SRL therapy were enrolled in a prospective trial with conversion from SRL to enteric coated mycophenolate sodium. Measurement of plasma erythropoietin and red cell indices were performed pre- and postconversion. Results. Renal function remained unchanged after conversion. Serum hemoglobin (Hb) increased in 18/21 (86%) of patients after conversion. Endogenous erythropoietin level decreased from a median of 28.3 (11.5-374) to 16.6 (3.1-78.8) mIU/mL, (P < 0.001); and the erythropoietin:Hb ratio dropped from 2.7 (0.7-34.3) to 1.2 (0.2-6.7), (P < 0.001); indicating less erythropoietin resistance after conversion. Mean corpuscular volume increased after conversion, but transferrin saturation and ferritin did not change. Conversion was complicated by posttransplant erythrocytosis in two patients. Discussion. Conversion from SRL to enteric coated mycophenolate sodium led to an increase in Hb and a decrease in erythropoietin resistance in stable kidney transplant recipients. Increase in Hb seemed to be independent of renal functional changes or changes in iron sequestration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据