4.6 Article

Risk factors for cardiovascular events after successful renal transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 209-216

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318160254f

关键词

renal transplantation; cardiovascular morbidity; mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Cardiovascular disease is a frequent cause of morbidity after renal transplantation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of cardiovascular events and to identify the main risk factors for cardiovascular complications and mortality in 2071 white adults with a renal transplant functioning for at least 1 year. Methods. Clinical events, routine biochemistry, and prescribed drugs at month 1, month 6, and yearly after transplantation were analyzed. Results. The incidence of cardiovascular events increased over time. At 15 years after transplantation, only 47% of surviving patients had not experienced any cardiovascular event. Risk factors associated with cardiovascular complications were mate gender (P=0.04), age (P<0.0001), arterial hypertension before transplantation (P<0.0001), longer pretransplant dialysis (P<0.0001), cardiovascular event before transplantation (P<0.0001), older era of transplantation (P=0.0009), center-specific effect (P=0.003), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (P=0.01), increased pulse pressure after transplantation (P=0.02), intake of corticosteroids (P=0.016), intake of azathioprine (P=0.016), lower serum albumin after transplantation (P=0.004), and higher serum triglyceride levels after transplantation (P=0.007). The risk of death was increased in patients with low or elevated hematocrit, while it was minimal with values around 38%. Conclusions. The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events after successful renal transplantation not only relates to baseline cardiovascular risk factors present at transplantation, but also to immunosuppressive drugs and posttransplantation traditional and nontraditional risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据