4.5 Article

Induction of suppressive allogeneic regulatory T cells via rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal globulin during homeostatic proliferation in rat kidney transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 108-119

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12448

关键词

homeostatic proliferation; kidney transplantation; rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal globulin; Tregs

资金

  1. International Society of Nephrology
  2. European Society for Organ Transplantation
  3. Spanish Red de Investigacion Renal [REDin-REN, ISCIII 06/0016]
  4. [FIS PI10/01786]
  5. [PI13/01263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental studies have shown that rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal globulin (ATG) can expand human CD4+CD25++Foxp3+ cells (Tregs). We investigated the major biological effects of a self-manufactured rabbit polyclonal anti-rat thymoglobulin (rATG) in vitro, as well as its effects on different peripheral T-cell subsets. Moreover, we evaluated the allogeneic suppressive capacity of rATG-induced Tregs in an experimental rat renal transplant model. Our results show that rATG has the capacity to induce apoptosis in T lymphocyte lymphocytes as a primary mechanism of T-cell depletion. Our in vivo studies demonstrated a rapid but transient cellular depletion of the main T cell subsets, directly proportional to the rATG dose used, but not of the effector memory T cells, which required significantly higher rATG doses. After rATG administration, we observed a significant proliferation of Tregs in the peripheral blood of transplanted rats, leading to an increase in the Treg/T effector ratio. Importantly, rATG-induced Tregs displayed a strong donor-specific suppressive capacity when assessed in an antigen-specific allogeneic co-culture. All of these results were associated with better renal graft function in rats that received rATG. Our study shows that rATG has the biological capacity immunomodulatory to promote a regulatory alloimmune milieu during post-transplant homeostatic proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据