4.5 Article

A casecontrol study of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 631-639

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/tri.12093

关键词

ABO-mismatch; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; cord blood; graft-versus-host disease

资金

  1. Health and Labour Science Research Grant (Research on Allergic Disease and Immunology) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591415] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a significant complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the pathogenesis and risks for the development of BOS have remained unclear. Therefore, a casecontrol study was conducted to investigate the risk factors for the development of BOS, which included the largest number of BOS cases; 196 patients with BOS were identified and compared with 1960 control recipients. The following were identified as significantly higher risk factors for the development of BOS: female recipients (OR 1.47, P=0.019), ABO-mismatch HSCT (minor mismatch, OR 1.67, P=0.015; major mismatch, OR 1.73, P=0.012; bidirectional mismatch, OR 1.96, P=0.018), busulfan+cyclophosphamide-based myeloablative conditioning (OR 1.74, P=0.016), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) involving the skin (OR 1.55, P=0.011). On the other hand, the risk for the development of BOS was significantly lower in patients receiving cord blood transplantation (OR 0.26, P=0.0011). With respect to other target organs of chronic GVHD, ocular involvement was significantly associated with BOS (OR 2.53, P<0.001). Prospective studies are required to elucidate the risk factors for the development of BOS, and future investigations should focus on finding a prophylactic approach against BOS based on these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据