4.2 Article

Different doses of micafungin for prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in hemato-oncological high-risk patients: a web-based non-interventional trial in four large university hospitals in Germany

期刊

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 968-974

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tid.12305

关键词

micafungin; prophylaxis; dose; effectiveness; stem cell transplantation; hemato-oncological high-risk patients

资金

  1. Astellas Pharma GmbH, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IntroductionTreatment indications of new antifungals in clinical practice often deviate from the strict criteria used in controlled clinical trials. Under routine clinical conditions, beneficial and adverse effects, not previously described in clinical trials may be observed. The aim of this study was to describe customary prescription and treatment strategies of micafungin (MCFG). MethodsA registry was set up on and physicians were invited to provide retrospective information on cases they had treated with MCFG. Documentation comprised demographic information, underlying disease, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of MCFG. ResultsA total of 125 episodes of patients hospitalized between September 2009 and February 2012 were documented, of which 7 had to be excluded because of incomplete documentation. The most common risk factors of patients were hematological malignancy (n=116, 98.3%) and antibiotic treatment >3days (n=115, 97.5%). MCFG was administered as prophylaxis in 106 (89.9%) patients. Median duration of MCFG application as prophylaxis was 21days (range: 3-78); 53 of the patients (50%) received a dose of 50mg, while the other 53 (50%) received 100mg/day. For the different doses, prophylactic outcome was rated as success in 42 (79.2%) vs. 52 (98.1%; P=0.004) patients. Fifty-five patients (51.9%) were treated with posaconazole before initiation of MCFG. Four patients (7.5%) developed a proven invasive fungal disease (IFD) while being treated with 50mg MCFG, compared to no patient treated with 100mg (P=0.118). At the end of MCFG prophylaxis, 24 (22.6%) patients were switched to fluconazole and 64 (60.3%) patients to posaconazole. ConclusionOur study shows clinical effectiveness of MCFG prophylaxis with low rates of breakthrough fungal infections. In most cases, MCFG was part of a multi-modal antifungal prophylactic strategy. Investigators reported fewer proven IFDs in patients receiving therapeutic doses of MCFG as prophylaxis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据