4.2 Article

Risk factors for late-onset cytomegalovirus disease in donor seropositive/recipient seronegative kidney transplant recipients who receive antiviral prophylaxis

期刊

TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 244-249

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00624.x

关键词

cytomegalovirus disease; kidney transplant; risk factor; retransplantation

资金

  1. Roche
  2. Vical
  3. Viropharma
  4. Chimerix
  5. Genentech
  6. [CA 15704]
  7. [CA 18029]
  8. [HL093294]
  9. [AI084019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurs frequently after cessation of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-seronegative kidney transplant recipients from seropositive donors (D+R-), and the risk factors are incompletely defined. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the incidence, clinical features, and risk factors for CMV disease in a cohort of D+R- kidney transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis at a single US transplant center using descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models. Results. CMV disease developed in 29 of 113 (26%) D+R- patients at a median of 185 days (interquartile range 116-231 days) post transplant, including CMVsyndrome (66%) and tissue invasive disease (34%). The incidence of CMVdisease was higher in patients who underwent re-transplantation (57% vs. 24%) and this factor was independently associated with a higher risk of CMVdisease in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 4.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-13; P = 0.016). Other demographic and transplant variables were not independently associated with a risk of late-onset CMVdisease. Conclusions. Despite a comprehensive analysis of patient and transplant variables, only re-transplantation was identified as a risk factor for CMVdisease in D+R- kidney transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis, but had limited clinical predictive value. The development of novel laboratory markers to identify patients at greatest risk for CMVdisease should be a priority for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据