4.2 Article

The complement interference phenomenon as a cause for sharp fluctuations of serum anti-HLA antibody strength in kidney transplant patients

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1-4, 页码 17-21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2013.09.005

关键词

Prozone phenomenon; Single antigen flow bead assay; HLA antibody; Crossmatch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The single antigen flow bead (SAFB) assay greatly improves the identification of antigenic specificity of anti-HLA alloantibodies. However, it may underestimate or miss high titer antibodies due to the prozone phenomenon caused by a competition between the fluorescent anti-IgG conjugate and serum complement, for the alloantibody. We explored this effect in our cohort of transplant candidates and transplanted recipients. Among a total of 292 and 269 patients with at least three different sera tested with class I and/or II SAFB assays respectively, we identified 9 patients (6 in class I and 3 in class II) who displayed a profound drop (>= 75%) followed by a subsequent rise (>= 100%), in strong (mean fluorescence intensity >8000) antibody levels, across an 18-month period. We postulated that such abrupt fluctuations were not explainable by naturally occurring transient desensitization. Sera were analysed with the SAFB assay using EDTA-treated serum and direct complement C1q staining, and with complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches (CDCXM and FCXM respectively). The prozone phenomenon was involved in all cases. Because it relies on complement activation, the CDCXM was not sensitive to this phenomenon, but the FCMXM was not either, although it resembles in its principle to the SAFB assay. Four additional anti-human conjugates targeting the IgG Fc fragment or the light chains did not circumvent the SAFB drawback. Therefore, a quick decrease in antibody strength must alert against a potential risk for recipients at the time of the transplant, using virtual crossmatch strategies. A prospective pre-transplant crossmatch still remains an ultimate safeguard. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据