4.2 Article

Mesenchymal stem cells together with mycophenolate mofetil inhibit antigen presenting cell and T cell infiltration into allogeneic heart grafts

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 157-163

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2010.12.002

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cell; Solid organ transplantation; Mycophenolate mofetil; Antigen; Presenting cells; T cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) can induce long-term acceptance in a rat heart transplantation model when injected prior to transplantation in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In contrast, MSC alone cause accelerated graft rejection. To better understand these conflicting data we studied the effects of MSC and MMF on lymphocyte populations in heart allografts and secondary lymphatic organs. Allogeneic MSC injected prior to transplantation are immunogenic in this model because activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells emerged earlier in secondary lymphatic organs of MSC- and MSC/MMF-treated animals, compared to animals not treated with MSC. Consequently T cells infiltrated the grafts of MSC-only treated animals promptly causing accelerated graft rejection. However, few T cells or antigen-presenting cells (APC) infiltrated the grafts of animals treated with MSC and MMF. Consistent with this finding, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and E-selectin was down-regulated exclusively in MSC/MMF-treated grafts, indicating that MSC together with MMF interfere with endothelial activation. Additionally, the presence of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enhanced MSC capabilities to suppress T cell proliferation in vitro. Interestingly, MMF did not influence serum IFN-gamma levels in vivo. Together, our data indicate that MSC pre-activate T cells, but co-treatment with MMF eliminates these T cells, decreases intragraft APC and T cell trafficking by inhibiting endothelial activation, and allows IFN-gamma stimulation of suppressive MSC. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据