4.7 Article

Pursuing type 1 diabetes mellitus and related complications through urinary proteomics

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 163, 期 3, 页码 188-199

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.09.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
  2. European Union
  3. QREN [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027554, PTDC/QUI-BIQ/119881/2010]
  4. FEDER
  5. COMPETE
  6. Quimica Organica and Produtos Naturais e Alimentares research unit [PEst-C/QUI/U10062/2013]
  7. [FCT PTDC/EXPL/BBB-BEP/0317/ 2012]
  8. [SFRH/BD/6664212009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease with multiple complications, and its successful management requires early diagnosis, to allow timely interventions. Here, we have comprehensively analyzed the proteome changes in urine of type 1 diabetic subjects with and without complications such as retinopathy and nephropathy. gel electrophoresis combined to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GeLC-MS/MS) analysis of midstream urine highlighted the mechanisms involved in disease pathogenesis as, for instance wound healing and blood coagulation in all diabetics or altered ganglioside metabolism in retinopathy, and also some urinary proteins with potential diagnosis value. From these, gelsolin and antithrombin-III appear as promising diagnosis markers for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), whereas ephrin type-B receptor 4 and vitamin K-dependent protein Z seem to be promising markers for advanced T1DM disease state presenting retinopathy and nephropathy (T1DM-R + N). Data also suggest urinary ganglioside GM2 activator and beta-hexosaminidase subunit beta as potential urinary markers of retinopathy in diabetics. Taken together, the present exploratory urinary proteomic analysis might be seen as an important starting point for studies targeting specific urinary proteins aimed at the implementation of new biomarkers for the early detection of T1DM-related microvascular complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据