4.7 Article

Hydroxyethyl starch reduces high stretch ventilation-augmented lung injury via vascular endothelial growth factor

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 157, 期 5, 页码 293-305

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.12.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council [98-2314-B-182A-084-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disruption of epithelial and endothelial barriers found in patients with acute lung injury often results in the need for the support of mechanical ventilation. High tidal volume (V-T) mechanical ventilation can increase lung damage through lung inflammation, but the mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesized that a colloid supply with hydroxyethyl starch would decrease neutrophil infiltration, lung edema, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in mice exposed to high V-T mechanical ventilation. Male C57BL/6 mice, weighing 20 g to 25 g, were exposed to high V-T (30 mL/kg) mechanical ventilation with room air for 1 h to 5 h and infused with 15 mL/kg/h normal saline or hydroxyethyl starch intravenously at the beginning and every 30 min during ventilation. Evans blue dye, lung wet-to-dry weight ratio, histopathologic grading of lung tissue, myeloperoxidase, and inflammatory cytokine were measured to establish the extent of lung injury. Knock-down of VEGF by short interfering RNA (siRNA) was used to explore the role of VEGF. High V-T ventilation induced the increases of microvascular permeability, neutrophil influx, expressions of VEGF mRNA and VEGF, production of VEGF protein, positive staining of VEGF in epithelium, and apoptotic epithelial cell death. Lung injury induced by high V-T ventilation was attenuated with the supply of hydroxyethyl starch and pharmacologic inhibition of VEGF expression by siRNA. We conclude that hydroxyethyl starch reduces high V-T mechanical ventilation-induced lung injury and neutrophil infiltration through an inhibition of VEGF expression. (Translational Research 2011;157:293-305)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据