4.7 Article

Arterial calcification:: a tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediated vascular Wnt-opothy

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 151, 期 5, 页码 233-239

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2007.12.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arterial calcification is common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and other chronic inflammatory disorders. Arterial calcification is associated with significant morbidity and increased early mortality. The molecular signature of vascular calcification in diabetes is strikingly similar to that of CKD. Low-grade arterial inflammation is common to both conditions, and increased levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) have been reported in both DM and CKD. Recently, we described a novel TNF-a. regulated Msx2-Wnt osteogenic program that regulates arterial calcification in an animal model of type 2 DM. TNF-a induces the osteogenic bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), Msx2, Wnt3a, and Wnt7 alpha mRNAs and leads to increased aortic calcium accumulation. Treatment with the TNF-alpha neutralizing antibody infliximab abrogates aortic BMP-2-Msx2-Wnt3a and Wnt7a signaling and attenuates aortic calcium accumulation significantly. Mice with vascular TNF-alpha augmented by the SM22-TNF-alpha transgene upregulate the aortic Msx2-Wnt3a/Wnt7a axis. Furthermore, SM22-TNF-alpha Tg;TOPGAL mice exhibit greater P-galactosidase reporter staining versus TOPGAL siblings in the aorta and coronaries, which indicates enhanced mural Wnt signaling in response to TNF-alpha. Thus, inflammatory TNF-alpha signals promote aortic osteogenic Msx2-Wnt programs in type 2 DM, and arterial calcification in this model is a TNF-alpha-driven Wnt-opathy. Having established the role of TNF-alpha in diabetic vascular calcification, an unmet need exists to evaluate the role of TNF-a and Msx2-Wnt signals in CKD-related calcification models. If validated in these models, then these findings will have significant therapeutic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据