4.5 Article

Noninvasive assessment of tumor VEGF receptors in response to treatment with Pazopanib: A molecular imaging study

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 56-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/tlo.09271

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [2R44CA113080, R43EB006679]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFRs) drive angiogenesis, and several VEGFR inhibitors are already approved for use as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. Although there is a clear benefit with these drugs in a variety of tumors, the clinical response varies markedly among individuals. Therefore, there is a need for an efficient method to identify patients who are likely to respond to antiangiogenic therapy and to monitor its effects over time. We have recently developed a molecular imaging tracer for imaging VEGFRs known as scVEGF/Tc-99m; an engineered single-chain (sc) form of VEGF radiolabeled with technetium Tc 99m (Tc-99m). After intravenous injection, scVEGF/Tc-99m preferentially binds to and is internalized by VEGFRs expressed within tumor vasculature, providing information on prevalence of functionally active receptors. We now report that VEGFR imaging readily detects the effects of pazopanib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor under clinical development, which selectively targets VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit in mice with HT29 tumor xenografts. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that the changes in VEGFR imaging reflect a dramatic pazopanib-induced decrease in the number of VEGFR-2(+)/CD31(+) endothelial cells (ECs) within the tumor vasculature followed by a relative increase in the number of ECs at the tumor edges. We suggest that VEGFR imaging can be used for the identification of patients that are responding to VEGFR-targeted therapies and for guidance in rational design, dosing, and schedules for combination regimens of antiangiogenic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据