4.5 Article

In Vivo Quantitative Microvasculature Phenotype Imaging of Healthy and Malignant Tissues Using a Fiber-Optic Confocal Laser Microprobe

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 84-94

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/tlo.08118

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [PO1CA117969, RO1EB001872, U24CA092782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Real-time in vivo imaging of the microvasculature may help both earlier clinical detection of disease and the understanding of tumor-host interaction at various stages of progression. In vivo confocal and multiphoton microscopy is often hampered by bulky optics setup and has limited access to internal organs. A fiber-optic setup avoids these limitations and offers great user maneuverability. We report here the in vivo validation of a fiber-optic confocal fluorescence microprobe imaging system. In addition, we developed an automated fractal-based image analysis to characterize microvascular morphology based on vessel diameter distribution, density, volume fraction, and fractal dimension from real-time data. The system is optimized for use in the far-red and near-infrared region. The flexible 1.5-mm-diameter fiber-optic bundle and microprobe enable great user maneuverability, with a field of view of 423 x 423 mu m and a tissue penetration of up to 15 mu m. Lateral and axial resolutions are 3.5 and 15 mu m. We show that it is possible to obtain high temporal and spatial resolution images of virtually any abdominal viscera in situ using a far-red blood pool imaging probe. Using an orthotopic model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, we characterized the tumor surface capillary and demonstrated that the imaging system and analysis can quantitatively differentiate between the normal and tumor surface capillary. This clinically approved fiber-optic system, together with the fractal-based image analysis, can potentially be applied to characterize other tumors in vivo and may be a valuable tool to facilitate their clinical evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据