4.3 Review

Measurement of Posttransfusion Red Cell Survival With the Biotin Label

期刊

TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 114-125

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.03.003

关键词

Biotin; Red cell volume; Red cell survival; Multiple density; Application; Nonradioactive; Vulnerable population

资金

  1. US Public Health Service National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01 HL046925]
  2. Thrasher Research Fund [0285-3]
  3. National Center for Research Resources, a part of the NIH [UL1RR024979, UL1TR000039, UL1 TR000077]
  4. US Department of Veterans Affairs [1 I01 CX000121-01]
  5. NHLBI [R25 HL108825]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this review is to summarize and critically assess information concerning the biotin method to label red blood cells (RBC) for use in studies of RBC and transfusion biology information that will prove useful to a broad audience of clinicians and scientists. A review of RBC biology, with emphasis on RBC senescence and in vivo survival, is included, followed by an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of biotin-labeled RBC (BioRBC) for measuring circulating RBC volume, posttransfusion RBC recovery, RBC life span, and RBC age-dependent properties. The advantages of BioRBC over Cr-51 RBC labeling, the current reference method, are discussed. Because the biotin method is straightforward and robust, including' the ability to follow the entire life spans of multiple RBC populations concurrently in the same subject, BioRBC offers distinct advantages for studying RBC biology and physiology, particularly RBC survival. The method for biotin labeling, validation of the method, and application of BioRBCs to studies of sickle cell disease, diabetes, and anemia of prematurity are reviewed. Studies documenting the safe use of BioRBC are reviewed; unanswered questions requiring future studies, remaining concerns, and regulatory barriers to broader application of BioRBC including adoption as a new reference method are also presented. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据