4.7 Article

Oil Spill Detection in Glint-Contaminated Near-Infrared MODIS Imagery

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 1112-1134

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70101112

关键词

oil spill detection; MODIS; sun glint; remote sensing techniques

资金

  1. Italian project RITMARE (Italian Ministry of Research (MIUR))
  2. EU [EU-VII FP SPACE 283367]
  3. MEDESS4MS (grant EU-MED program) [4175/2S-MED11-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a methodology to detect oil spills using MODIS near-infrared sun glittered radiance imagery. The methodology was developed by using a set of seven MODIS images (training dataset) and validated using four other images (validation dataset). The method is based on the ratio image R = L-GN'/L-GN, where L-GN' is the MODIS-retrieved normalized sun glint radiance image and L-GN the same quantity, but obtained from the Cox and Munk isotropic (independent of wind direction) sun glint model. We show that in the R image, while clean water pixel values tend to one, oil spills stand out as anomalies. Moreover, we provide a criterion to distinguish between positive and negative oil-water contrast. A pixel in an R image is classified as a potential oil spill or water via a variable threshold R-s as a function of L-GN', where the threshold values are obtained from the slicks of our training dataset. Two different fitting curves are provided for R-s, according to the contrast sign. The selection of the correct fitting curve is based on the contrast type, resulting from the criterion above. Results indicate that the thresholding is able to isolate the spills and that the spills of the validation dataset are successfully detected. Spurious look-alike features, such as clouds, and other non-spill features, e.g., large areas at the glint region border, are also detected as oil spills and must be eliminated. We believe that our methodology represents a novel and promising, though preliminary, approach towards automatic oil spill detection in optical satellite images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据