4.2 Article

Autologous stem cell transplant recipients tolerate haploidentical related-donor natural killer cell-enriched infusions

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 412-418

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03764.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HB-37166, HHSSN268201000008C]
  2. NIH [1RO1HL093981-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), infusing natural killer (NK) cells from a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched donor can mediate an antileukemic effect. The graft-versus-tumor effect after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may result in less disease relapse. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a PhaseI clinical trial to assess the safety and feasibility of infusing distantly processed donor NK-enriched mononuclear cell (NK-MNC) infusions from a MHC haplotypemismatched (haploidentical) donor to patients who recently underwent ASCT for a hematologic malignancy. On Day 1, peripheral blood MNCs were obtained by steady-state leukapheresis and sent from Boston to the Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) facility at the University of Minnesota, where immunomagnetic depletion of CD3 cells was performed on Day2. NK-MNC products were then returned to Boston on Day2 for infusion on Day 3. Toxicity, cellular product characteristics, and logistic events were monitored. RESULTS: At a median of 90 days (range, 49-191days) after ASCT, 13 patients were treated with escalating doses of NK-MNCs per kilogram from 105 to 2x107. Adverse effects included Grade2 rigors and muscle aches, but no Grade3 or 4 events and no graft-versus-host disease or marrow suppression. One air courier delay occurred. NK-MNC products were viable with cytotoxic activity after transport. CONCLUSION: CD3-depleted, MHC-mismatched allogeneic NK-MNC infusions can be safely and feasibly administered to patients after ASCT after distant processing and transport, justifying further development of this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据