4.7 Article

Assimilation of Two Variables Derived from Hyperspectral Data into the DSSAT-CERES Model for Grain Yield and Quality Estimation

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 12400-12418

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs70912400

关键词

Hyperspectral; DSSAT-CERES; winter wheat; particle swarm optimization algorithm; yield; grain protein content

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471285, 41171281]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Capability Construction of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences [KJCX20150409]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4141001, 6132015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of remote sensing and crop growth models has become an effective tool for yield estimation and a potential method for grain quality estimation. In this study, two assimilation variables (derived from a hyperspectral sensor), called leaf area index (LAI) and canopy nitrogen accumulation (CNA), were jointly used to calibrate the sensitive parameters and initial states of the DSSAT-CERES crop model, to improve simulated output of the grain yield and protein content of winter wheat. The results show that the modified simple ratio (MSR) and normalized difference red edge (NDRE) better estimated LAI and CNA, respectively, compared with the other possible vegetation indices. The integration of both LAI and CNA resulted in a more robust DSSAT-CERES models with than each one alone. The R-2 and RMSE values, respectively, of the regression between the simulated (using the two assimilation variables method) and measured LAI were 0.828 and 0.494, and for CNA were 0.808 and 20.26 kg N.ha(-1). These two assimilation variables resulted in grain yield and protein content estimates of winter wheat with a high precision and R-2 and RMSE values of 0.698 and 0.726 ton.ha(-1), and 0.758% and 1.16%, respectively. This study provides a more robust method for estimating the grain yield and protein content of winter wheat based on the integration of the DSSAT-CERES crop model and remote sensing data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据