4.2 Article

Is red blood cell rheology preserved during routine blood bank storage?

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 941-948

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02521.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) units stored for more than 2 weeks at 4 degrees C are currently considered of impaired quality. This opinion has primarily been based on altered RBC rheologic properties (i.e., enhanced aggregability, reduced deformability, and elevated endothelial cell interaction), during prolonged storage of nonleukoreduced RBC units. In this study, the rheologic properties and cell variables of leukoreduced RBC units, during routine blood bank storage in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol, were investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten leukoreduced RBC units were stored at the blood bank for 7 weeks at 4 degrees C. RBCs were tested weekly for aggregability, deformability, and other relevant variables. RESULTS: RBC aggregability was significantly reduced after the first week of storage but recovered during the following weeks. After 7 weeks aggregability was slightly, but significantly, reduced (46.9 +/- 2.4-44.3 +/- 2.2 aggregation index). During storage the osmotic fragility was not significantly enhanced (0.47 +/- 0.01% phosphate-buffered saline) and the deformability at shear stress of 3.9 Pa was not significantly reduced (0.36 +/- 0.01 elongation index [EI]). The deformability at 50 Pa was reduced (0.58 +/- 0.01-0.54 +/- 0.01 EI) but remained within reference values (0.53 +/- 0.04). During 5 weeks of storage, adenosine triphosphate was reduced by 54% whereas mean cell volume, pH, and mean cell hemoglobin concentration were minimally affected. CONCLUSIONS: RBC biochemical and physical alterations during storage minimally affected the RBC ability to aggregate and deform, even after prolonged storage. The rheologic properties of leukoreduced RBC units were well preserved during 7 weeks of routine blood bank storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据