4.2 Article

Cause-specific mortality associated with leukoreduced, buffy coat-depleted, or no blood transfusion after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a posttrial 15-year follow-up study

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 259-263

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02825.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that both leukoreduced (LR) and buffy coat-depleted (BCD) blood transfusions had a detrimental effect on long-term overall survival in patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal disease. This analysis investigates long-term cause-specific mortality in trial participants diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used the Danish Civil Registration System to follow 448 trial participants with CRC, from their enrollment in 1992 to 1995 until January 2007. A total of 108 patients were transfused with BCD blood, 94 with LR blood, and 246 did not receive a transfusion (NT). We reviewed death certificates for study patients who died during follow-up. Cause-of-death data were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8 and -10). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used for risk adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 43% of NT, 28% of BCD, and 27% of LR transfused patients were alive after 15 years of follow-up (p = 0.001 for transfused vs. NT patients). For LR-transfused versus NT patients the adjusted mortality ratio for death from rectal cancer was 1.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.38), and for death from cardiovascular disease 2.12 (95% CI, 1.23-3.62). For BCD versus NT patients the adjusted mortality ratio for death from rectal cancer was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.61-2.33) and for cardiovascular disease it was 1.68 (95% CI, 0.97-2.91). CONCLUSION: LR transfusion is associated with decreased long-term survival due to death from cardiovascular disease. A similar but weaker tendency was observed for BCD transfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据