4.2 Article

Photochemical inactivation with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light of Plasmodium and Babesia in platelet and plasma components

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 48, 期 8, 页码 1676-1684

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01762.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted cases of malaria and babesiosis have been well documented. Current efforts to screen out contaminated blood products result in component wastage due to the lack of specific detection methods while donor deferral does not always guarantee safe blood products. This study evaluated the efficacy of a photochemical treatment (PCT) method with amotosalen and long-wavelength ultraviolet light (UVA) to inactivate these agents in red blood cells (RBCs) contaminating platelet (PLT) and plasma components. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasmodium falciparum- and Babesia microti-contaminated RBCs seeded into PLT and plasma components were treated with 150 mu mol per L amotosalen and 3 J per cm(2) UVA. The viability of both pathogens before and after treatment was measured with infectivity assays. Treatment with 150 mu mol per L amotosalen and 1 J per cm(2) UVA was used to assess the robustness of the PCT system. RESULTS: No viable B. microti was detected in PLTs or plasma after treatment with 150 mol per L amotosalen and 3 J per cm(2) UVA, demonstrating a mean inactivation of greater than 5.3 log in PLTs and greater than 5.3 log in plasma. After the same treatment, viable P. falciparum was either absent or below the limit of quantification in three of four replicate experiments both in PLTs and in plasma demonstrating a mean inactivation of at least 6.0 log in PLTs and at least 6.9 log in plasma. Reducing UVA dose to 1 J per cm(2) did not significantly affect the level of inactivation. CONCLUSION: P. falciparum and B. microti were highly sensitive to inactivation by PCT. Pathogen inactivation approaches could reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted parasitic infections and avoid unnecessary donor exclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据